Latch vs QuickBooks.
Dedicated delivered.

QuickBooks is one of the most widely used accounting platforms globally, and plenty of UK landlords have tried to make it work for their rental properties. It offers solid bank feeds, transaction categorisation, invoicing, and financial reporting. If you have an accountant, there is a good chance they already know QuickBooks well.

But like Xero, QuickBooks has no understanding of property management concepts. There are no tenants, no leases, no units, no rent schedules, and no compliance tracking. To track rent by tenant and property, you need to create custom invoices, set up classes or tags, and build manual workarounds that become increasingly fragile as your portfolio grows. A missed tag or miscategorised transaction means your property-level P&L is wrong.

QuickBooks was also designed primarily for the US market. While it works in the UK, some features — particularly around tax compliance, bank integrations, and support — are not as well-tuned for UK landlords as they are for American small businesses. MTD support exists but requires additional configuration that is not always straightforward.

Latch eliminates all of these workarounds. Every transaction is automatically linked to a property, tenant, and lease. Compliance certificates are tracked with automatic alerts. Rent is chased by AI. And MTD reports are generated from data that is already structured correctly — because the software was built for landlords, not adapted from a generic accounting tool. QuickBooks has stronger accounting fundamentals (bank feeds, Intuit Assist AI, GoCardless), but Latch offers purpose-built property management that QuickBooks cannot replicate.